↧
Bright eyes
↧
Pink chemise
↧
↧
Gremlin is people-watching.
This picture was made while taking photos of belly dancers.
![]()
↧
Which straw breaks the camel's back...or patience?
Interesting article by by friend Boris Karpa.
↧
Suppressing HK P7 pistol
Has anyone successfully suppressed P7? How did the balance and the functioning work out? What was the cost of the whe process, not counting the suppressor itself?
![]()
HK traditional loading method. Should still work, no?
HK traditional loading method. Should still work, no?
↧
↧
Studio cat
↧
Pretty face
↧
Pixie
↧
Defining "child porn"
Never mind that "porn" at large has never been defined precisely. Consider this:
[illustration of a person in a sexual situation]
Joe Blow, 17 | Joe Blow, 19
The left caption causes the image to become child porn, the right does not. The same applies to hand-drawn characters, such as the "Gunsmith Cats" comics. Wikipedia lists the age of the younger character (who is shown masturbating at least once) as 17. Various translations list it as low as 14 and as high as 19. In other words, the entire comic strip can be considered "child porn"...or not, depending on one arbitrarily picked number. Since the degree of realism isn't defined, either, we could have South Park or even more abstract animations classified as porn if deemed thus by authorities. They certainly have enough sexual content involving cartoon "minors". Does this make sense to anyone?
Not that most other laws make any more sense than this. The end result is obedience to laws out of fear and not out of respect for their reasonable nature...and the ability to crack down on anyone because every person breaks many laws daily unknowingly.
[illustration of a person in a sexual situation]
Joe Blow, 17 | Joe Blow, 19
The left caption causes the image to become child porn, the right does not. The same applies to hand-drawn characters, such as the "Gunsmith Cats" comics. Wikipedia lists the age of the younger character (who is shown masturbating at least once) as 17. Various translations list it as low as 14 and as high as 19. In other words, the entire comic strip can be considered "child porn"...or not, depending on one arbitrarily picked number. Since the degree of realism isn't defined, either, we could have South Park or even more abstract animations classified as porn if deemed thus by authorities. They certainly have enough sexual content involving cartoon "minors". Does this make sense to anyone?
Not that most other laws make any more sense than this. The end result is obedience to laws out of fear and not out of respect for their reasonable nature...and the ability to crack down on anyone because every person breaks many laws daily unknowingly.
↧
↧
Another product photo
↧
A very smart kid
↧
FarmDad
↧
Today's work
↧
↧
Short 870
↧
FN SCAR 5.56 carbine and GRSC 1-4x scope
↧
PLR16
↧
Find the Easter egg in this photo
The incongruity should be pretty obvious, especially if you click on the image to see the larger version. Iron sights are up to show co-witnessing with the red dot.
↧
↧
Aimpoint clone
Since I can't afford Aimpoints for all of my rifles, I've been using clones on the .22 trainer variants of the AR and SU rifles. The latest version has battery life of about 3,000 hours at brightness level 7, good enough for my use. Performance seems similar to H1 micro, except for somewhat less water-resistance. The brightness dial can go from 0 to the brightest setting, unlike H1 which only rotates in one direction. Primary Arms also sells real Aimpoints and recommends them for fighting guns.
![]()
↧
Live in San Francisco, it's a poster!
My photo, CalGuns graphic design.
↧
Chomsky
Looking over Chomsky's writings, I find quite a few points of agreement and some of disagreement. He seems very poorly regarded by most of my acquaintanes. Why?
↧